Galatians 3:1-18
I. V. 1-6
a. V. 1
i. Translated literally, “who has cast the evil eye upon you”
ii. They are being criticized not for a lack of knowledge, but for a lack of moral judgment, they are foolish, not ignorant
iii. Anoetoi, or “foolish”, is also used in Luke 24:25 where Jesus refers to the disciples on the road to Emmaus as “foolish, and slow of heart”
b. V. 2
i. A hearing that is faithful, or a hearing that leads to faith
ii. Cf. Isa. 53:1
c. V. 3
i. This is as much about how they live in the present and future, as it is how they entered the Christian life.
ii. Cf. Phil. 1:6
d. V. 4
i. “experience” or “suffer”?
e. V. 5
i. Compound form of verb implies “bountifully supplies”
f. V. 6
i. Believed God, not believed in God. This is more than intellectual assent to God’s existence, this is trust
ii. Cf. Gen. 15:6
iii. The Spirit=justification in order for the comparison to Abraham’s faith=righteousness to hold
iv. Cf. Psalm 106:30-31 for “reckoned as righteousness”
g. The Spirit is mentioned for the first time in these verses
i. The Spirit comes in and with the preaching of the crucified Christ
ii. The Spirit is set in opposition to the flesh
iii. The Spirit is the new age, and thus the source of life and vitality
1. Cf. Acts 14:8-10
iv. The Spirit comes to the whole community, and not a select few
1. Cf. Joel 2:23-32
2. Cf. Acts 2:38-39
II. V. 7-14
a. Vv. 7-9
i. Cf. Gen. 12:3, 22:18
ii. Paul redefines the definition of who is Abraham’s offspring
iii. Those who believe as Abraham did, are blessed as he was
iv. By invoking the example of Abraham, Paul is actually closer to the source, or beginning of faith in God than the Judiazers, commonalities with Abraham pre-date the Law
b. Vv. 10-12
i. V. 10
1. Cf. Deut. 27:26
ii. V. 11
1. Cf. Habakkuk 2:4 (which is also used in Rom. 1:17)
2. Paul ties living to “being righteous by faith”
iii. V. 12
1. Cf. Lev. 18:5
2. Law and faith are diametrically opposed
3. Human-weakness and salvation history uphold “justification by faith”
c. Vv. 13-14
i. V. 13
1. Paul had to refute his own former position, which during the time he persecuted the church was surely that Jesus’ death proved that he was cursed
2. Cf. Num. 25:4 and II Sam. 21:6
d. The Rabbis saw two aspects of the law at work:
i. Haggadah- Who are we?
ii. Halakah- What are we to do?
iii. Paul argues that the emphasis lies on the first, and that it has been misinterpreted
III. V. 15-18
a. V. 15
i. No one changes an agreement that has already been made, ex post facto
b. V. 16
i. “Issue” or “offspring” is singular. This is not a strained interpretation, as it was historical reality with Isaac
ii. The seed is Christ when it comes to faith, the topic of discussion here
c. V. 17
i. The ratification of the covenant, or promise, began long before the law, with the stories of Isaac, Jacob, and the twelve tribes
ii. The law cannot change the pre-existing promise
d. Paul may be confronting here a rabbinic idea that the Law was pre-existent. By fixing it in its historical context, Paul shows that in fact the promise predates the Law
No comments:
Post a Comment